Project · Project
Contribution Guide
Propose corrections and improvements while preserving editorial standards.
On this page
CorrectionsContent proposalsEditorial requirementsTechnical contributionsLicensing and disclosureReview processContributions are reviewed for practical usefulness, evidence quality, disclosure and fit with the project scope.
Corrections
Use the correction request template for factual, source, accessibility or editorial errors. Identify the page, the exact issue and a primary source where available.
Content proposals
A proposal should answer one distinct operator or executive question, explain practical value, identify the evidence or operating basis and disclose relevant interests.
Adapt this guidance to member context. Seek professional legal and privacy advice where regulatory obligations apply.
Editorial requirements
Accepted guidance must be direct, topic-specific and free of invented statistics, testimonials and outcomes. External factual claims need nearby sources. Publisher experience and judgment must be labeled.
Technical contributions
Preserve canonical URLs, base-path behavior, accessibility, template downloads and static export. Run the full test suite before opening a pull request.
Licensing and disclosure
Accepted content is published under CC BY 4.0. Contributors should disclose commercial, organizational or personal relationships that could affect the contribution.
Review process
The publisher reviews scope, evidence, originality, style, disclosure and technical quality. Acceptance is an editorial decision and does not create an endorsement of the contributor.
Publisher perspective
This guide reflects the operating experience and editorial judgment of Open Future Forum and Murray Newlands. It is practical guidance, not an official industry standard or legal advice.
Read the full disclosure →